Junio 2018
 << < > >>


¿Quién está en línea?

Miembro: 0
Visitante: 1

rss Sindicación


Mossimo t-shirts at Target: A simple way to do your wardrobe a favor

Didn't you get the memo? T-shirts aren't just for the gym any more.

In fact, the importance of having good T-shirts around cannot be understated. And no, we are not talking about the F.B.I. (Female Body Inspector) shirt you bought at the beach on Spring Break, or the freebie you got for running the 5k last year. No, we're talking about simple, thin weight, solid color T-shirts that can serve as the basis for a cool, understated outfit, or add color to an otherwise drab ensemble. Peep this...

Right now Target is selling Mossimo V-necks* and crew necks in a whole mess of cool colors for $7.99. "Seven ninety-nine?" you might say. "Isn't that a bit much?" No. Trust me, for something that can fill in the gaps in your wardrobe and make you look really cool this summer, $7.99 is nothing. Stop in at the Target at the Glendale Shopping Center on Keystone & 62nd, or at any Indianapolis Target location, and check some out. Seriously, it's worth dropping $15 or $22 bucks on two or three of these.

Even if you can't make it to Target to catch the Mossimo shirts, here's a little primer on how to select a cool T-shirt in the future. For maximum defness, a T-shirt must meet the following qualifications:

1.) Plain. To work properly, a cool T-shirt has to be plain or--at the most--have only a subtle, unique, or artsy logo visible. But tread carefully in those waters. At first, you might want to just stick with plain. The time to support your favorite sports team is on game day, not on Saturday night.

2.) Cool colors. Since the T-shirt is plain, the color should stand out for itself. Here is where you get to have some fun. The classic white or grey T-shirt works for a Saturday afternoon at the park, but for Saturday night, spiff-up with an unusual color like orange, aqua, maroon, teal, etc. You'd be really surprised what a colored T-shirt can do for an outfit. For example, if you've got a navy blazer and a pair of jeans, throw an orange T-shirt on and suddenly you've stepped from Country Club to Night Club. If you're willing to get creative, the skies are the limit.

3.) Thickness. Or rather, thinness. Cool T-shirts have to be thinner than your standard, cotton Fruit of the Loom or Hanes Beefy-T. Thin shirts just seem to fit better and highlight the contours of your body better. Now, if you're less than confident about the "contours of your body," think about how you want to play this one. Do whatever you feel comfortable with, but realize that the thinness is a double edged.

sword, and will highlight any extra baggage and/or manboob issues. Just saying...

So listen...don't overlook this simple way to enhance your wardrobe. If you do it right, you can almost wear a T-shirt at job interview nowadays...if the job you're applying for is Badass Style Ninja, that is. Seriously, once you get wise to the power and versatility of good T-shirts, you will open up new fashion horizons you never dreamed possible. Trust me. I write a fashion blog...

*(Incidentally, V-necks are also a little bit cooler right now than crew necks. Something about the V-neck suggests a more relaxed, "ready to party" look than the crew neck. But, whatever you're more comfortable with. That's the key.)

Admin · 362 vistas · Escribir un comentario

Groups With Liberal Ties Tapped To Re-Elect The GOP Establishment

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) got a boost in the last election from a little-known nonprofit called Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions. The group calls itself conservative, but its support for greater federal funding of alternative energy drew the attention of Tennessee tea party groups, who decried what they saw as its liberal agenda.

Tea party activists were further agitated by the scant information available about Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions. It pushed for increased public and private investment in alternative energy. It ran an issue ad praising Alexanders "bold" energy plan in 2013. But whose money was funding that message?

If the tea party groups had known the full story, they might have gone ballistic.

A Huffington Post examination of tax records, accessed on, found that in its first year of operations, Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions was funded with $1 million in seed money from two nonprofits often linked to liberal causes. From June 2012 through June 2013, the group received $500,000 each from the Advocacy Fund and the Trust for Energy Innovation.

The Advocacy Fund, formerly the Tides Advocacy Fund, is a key backer of liberal nonprofits across the country, distributing $11.8 million in grants in 2013. It currently funds groups engaged in promoting immigration reform, increasing worker protections, reforming chemical safety laws and increasing investment in the solar energy industry. The Advocacy Fund did not respond to a request for comment.

The newer Trust for Energy Innovation, which also did not respond to a request for comment, sent out $12 million from its inception in 2011 through May 2013, and its recipients included such traditionally Democratic environmental groups as the League of Conservation Voters and the Sierra Club. The trust has also made grants to conservative organizations like YG Network, a nonprofit closely connected to former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.).

The Advocacy Fund and the Trust for Energy Innovation are both 501(c)(4) nonprofits, like Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions, and similarly do not disclose the actual humans or corporations funding them.

James Dozier, president of Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions, said in a statement to HuffPost that his group has received funding from 800 donors and backing from more than 5,000 "conservative activists."

"CRES was founded with a commitment to conservative, free market solutions to America's energy challenges and we will continue to advance that mission," Dozier said.

In last year's elections, Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions wound up spending $1.5 million on direct electoral efforts to support three establishment Republicans -- Alexander, Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.) and Rep. Mike Simpson (Idaho) -- against tea party primary challengers and five others -- Sen.

Susan Collins (Maine), Rep. Joe Heck (Nev.) and House candidates Barbara Comstock (Va.), Carlos Curbelo (Fla.) and Richard Tisei (Mass.) -- in general election races against Democrats. Except for Tisei, all these candidates won in November.

The grants by the Advocacy Fund and the Trust for Energy Innovation to affect GOP primary politics highlight the way that outside interest groups can influence elections with little disclosure before voters go to the ballot box.

"This perfectly illustrates the problem that you have an organization that is running ads in a campaign and voters dont know who is behind it," said Bill Allison, editorial director for the Sunlight Foundation, a pro-transparency nonprofit that tracks nonprofit political spending.

Equally important, the blurring of liberal-conservative lines is a reminder of how American business pursues its ends all along the political spectrum.

Dozier, the Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions president, did not respond to questions regarding a previous statement by the nonprofit that it received no funding from donors involved in the energy industry.

In August 2014, group spokesman Christopher Maloney had told The Commercial Appeal of Memphis, Tennessee, that the nonprofit "has no connections, formally or informally, with any specific energy industry."

But the board of the Trust for Energy Innovation includes Reuben Munger. Munger, who is also a board member at the League of Conservation Voters, leads Vision Ridge Partners, a venture capital fund directly invested in alternative energy companies that gain from federal support -- of the kind backed by Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions.

Vision Ridge Partners holds investments in solar companies like Sungevity, Mercatus and GSSG Energy, which benefit from federal tax credits; transportation companies like the battery-powered bus maker Proterra, which receive federal grants from the Federal Transit Administration; and energy-efficient product companies like Indo Windows, whose business is boosted by federal tax credits for the installation of energy-efficient windows and other materials. Calls to Vision Ridge Partners were not answered.

Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions has chosen to support environmentally aware Republican senators. Alexander, Graham and Collins were among just five GOP senators backing a measure that would have acknowledged that human activity is causing global climate change.

Those three senators also received support from more well-established environmental groups like the League of Conservation Voters, which backed Collins campaign, and the Environmental Defense Action Fund, which spent nearly $250,000 to help Alexander. Graham was one of the few Republicans involved in talks over cap-and-trade legislation to control greenhouse gas emissions.

Even so, Alexander, Collins and Graham have also called for more oil and gas drilling and support construction of the Keystone XL pipeline. The same is true of the four Republican House candidates that Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions helped elect in 2014.

Aside from intervening in elections to push establishment Republicans, Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions has also registered to lobby on energy issues, using lobbyists from McDonald Hopkins and Crossroads Strategies. In 2013, that effort included McDonald Hopkins Jennifer LaTourette, wife of former Rep. Steve LaTourette (R-Ohio), a central player in the anti-tea party effort from his position as head of the moderate conservative Main Street Partnership.

Earlier in 2014, Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) gave opening remarks at a panel discussion hosted by Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions. Following the election, the group presented Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) and Rep. Chris Gibson (R-N.Y.) talking about the need for free market solutions to advancing alternative energy. Both Ayotte and Portman are up for re-election in 2016.

Ayotte's remarks at the latter event have already been turned into an issue ad promoting her position on "American energy independence."

Admin · 839 vistas · Escribir un comentario

Duke lacrosse prosecutor disbarred -

Story Highlights NEW: North Carolina State Bar revokes Mike Nifong's law license

Nifong's attorney earlier said client feels he deserves disbarment

Committee finds Nifong violated numerous rules of conduct

Athletes' attorneys say they will press for criminal charges

RALEIGH, North Carolina (CNN) -- The prosecutor in the Duke University lacrosse team rape case was disbarred Saturday for unethical conduct, and the chairman of the disciplinary committee blamed "political ambition" for his downfall.

Earlier Saturday, the panel of the North Carolina State Bar concluded that Durham County, North Carolina, District Attorney Mike Nifong violated appeal attorney than a dozen ethics rules in prosecuting the case against the now-exonerated players.

"This matter has been a fiasco," said disciplinary committee chairman F. Colorado’s award-winning auto accident litigation finance companies personal injury law firm, providing the highest caliber representation with a proven track record of getting results. Our leading Denver personal injury attorneys will move mountains to get you the results you deserve. We are dedicated to our clients and have helped thousands of people throughout Colorado, recovering millions of dollars, and always offering 100% free consultations. Call us today to find out how we can help!Lane Williamson. "It seems that at the root of it is self-deception arising out of self-interest. (Watch Williamson deliver the verdict Video)

"We had a prosecutor who was faced with a very unusual situation in which the confluence of his self-interest collided with a very volatile mix of race, sex and class."

The panel determined Nifong withheld key DNA evidence from the players' defense attorneys that might have cleared them earlier, and lied to the presiding judge and state bar investigators.

The three students -- Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and Dave Evans -- were accused of sexually assaulting an escort-service dancer at a party in March 2006.

Two DNA tests found no match between any of the three men and evidence in the case, but Nifong -- who was up for re-election at the time -- pursued the prosecution anyway.

North Carolina's attorney general eventually took over the case and in April of this year determined the charges were unfounded and said Nifong would face a state bar disciplinary hearing.

"Dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation"

Throughout the proceedings Saturday, Nifong sat quietly with no expression.

As the three former Duke students and their families looked on, Williamson said Nifong practiced "dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation."

"We are in unanimous agreement there is no discipline short of disbarment that would be appropriate in this case, given the magnitude of the offenses we have found and legal advice effect upon the profession and the public," Williamson said. (Read the ethics complaintexternal link)

Williamson said that racially inflammatory remarks Nifong made last year "were to further his political ambition." The three athletes are white, and their accuser is black.

Nifong was re-elected in November.

The bar committee found Nifong lied to the judge in the rape case about whether he knew of any evidence that would exonerate the defendants. After that lie, "in his mind the facts remained that way in the face of developing evidence that that was not in fact the case," Williamson said.

After a recess in the hearing, Nifong's attorney surprised the panel by saying his client believed he deserved to be disbarred.

"I've talked with Mr. Nifong, and he has told me [that] in light of the findings of fact this commission has made -- and he's told me that he believes this has been a fair and full hearing of the facts -- that he believes that disbarment is the appropriate punishment in this case," defense attorney David Freedman said.

Freedman also said Nifong would waive all right of appeal in the proceedings.

"He hopes this helps restore some of the confidence in the criminal justice system of North Carolina," Freedman said, according to The Associated Press.

A tearful Nifong told the court Friday that he would resign as district attorney, regardless of what the committee decided. He also apologized to the players and their families and to the community.

One of those testifying Saturday was Evans' father, David Charles Evans, who said the ordeal caused extreme stress to him and his family.

Evans said his son "believes that when he dies, no matter what he does in his life, he will be [remembered as] one of the three Duke players accused of rape."

State Bar prosecutor Douglas Brocker told the committee that "Mr. Nifong did not act as a minister of justice, but as a minister of injustice," AP reported.

After the hearing, attorneys for the exonerated lacrosse players said they would push for criminal charges against Nifong.

"I don't think that any of us are done with Mr. Nifong yet," said Jim Cooney, Seligmann's attorney.

Admin · 225 vistas · Escribir un comentario

Legal Consequences of Drinking and Driving - DUI/DWI

Bottle in a hand while drivingFor many years, a DUI/DWI was handled much like any routine traffic violation. learn what to do during a Truck Accident situation. In case you're looking for some information on Accident Help visit now!Attitudes have changed, however, and so have the laws in most states. Driving under the influence or while intoxicated is now usually treated as a serious criminal offense.

In most states, you can be convicted if your blood alcohol content is.08 percent or greater, or if you fail a field sobriety test. The blood alcohol content limit is even lower for commercial drivers and drivers under the age of 21.

The Difference Between DUI and DWI

The terms DUI and DWI both refer to the act of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol or other substances. DUI means "driving under the influence." DWI is an acronym for "driving while intoxicated." In many states, the two terms are used interchangeably. In certain states, however, the terms are given different weight.

In these states, DWI is the more serious offense in which the driver was intoxicated, while DUI is regarded as a lesser offense. A higher blood alcohol level may result in the driver being charged with DWI instead of a DUI.

DUI/DWI Penalties Are Serious

A first-time DUI/DWI conviction typically results in severe penalties. Depending on the state, you may be subject to some or all of the following penalties for a first offense:

Temporary impounding of your vehicle

A fine of up to several thousand dollars

Installation of an ignition lock that prevents your car from starting if you've been drinking


Possible jail time

Revocation of your driver's license

Community service

Completion of substance abuse classes at your own expense

These penalties increase substantially if you are involved in an accident or you are a repeat offender. You will also be saddled with a criminal record that may haunt you for years or even decades.

You Could Be Charged With a Felony

If you have multiple prior convictions, you can be prosecuted in any state for felony DUI/DWI - even if no accident occurred. In Florida, you can be prosecuted for felony DUI on your third offense within 10 years, and you can be charged with a felony for even a first offense if you caused an accident - particularly if someone was injured. If the accident resulted in a death, you can be charged with manslaughter or vehicular homicide, both of which can lead to imprisonment for years or even decades.

Common Defenses Against a Charge of Drunk Driving

DUI/DWI lawyers use a variety of defense strategies that may lead to a "not guilty" verdict or reduce the penalties you face. Your lawyer may challenge the reason for the original traffic stop, the results of a field sobriety test or the results of a breathalyzer test.

You May Be Able to Have Your Criminal Record Erased

In some states, you can file a request with the court asking to have your criminal record "expunged" - which generally means that it will be erased from public records. Some states expunge DUI arrests and charges but not convictions, while other states expunge first-time DUI convictions. States often place strict conditions on expungements.

For example, if you've had no previous criminal convictions, your request for expungement can be granted. In most states, the police and courts will still have access to your criminal record even after an expungement.

Don't Drive Drunk Criminal Lawyer Can Help

The law surrounding DUI/DWI arrests and convictions is complicated. Plus, the facts of each case are unique. Don't Drive Drunk article provides a brief, general introduction to the topic. For more detailed, specific information, please contact a criminal lawyer.

Admin · 73 vistas · Escribir un comentario

Jury Duty, The Court Summons We Dread

When the specified day arrived, I drove thirty-five miles in rush hour traffic to the court house. Parking was limited, yet, I found a spot within a reasonable distance of the building. By 8:00 am, I was seated in the designated jury call area surrounded by a room full of my peers. Each sat nervously awaiting whatever would happen next.

Within moments the bailiff arrived and took a position behind a podium at the front of the room. First, he called for anyone who thought they had a valid reason not to serve to come forward. A number of people made a beeline to the front of the room to give an outpouring of testimonials aimed at being excused from serving on a panel. Those whose excuse met the stringent criteria for dismissal left the holding room one by one. The remainder of us, who had remained seated, had little hope for a reprieve as our numbers diminished.

Soon, my name was called along with fifty-four other prospective jurors. The judge directed us to report to Courtroom Four where we entered single file into the solemn room. The Bailiff instructed us to call out hire us sequential number as we took our seats.

Anyone with a number under thirteen stood a strong chance for selection in this trial where twelve jurors would be chosen. The attorneys took their turns asking questions of the prospective group of jurors while we had our first look at hire us defendant..

Some of those who were still trying to get out of serving on the jury admitted to prejudice that most people would be ashamed to admit privately, much less state in open court. The prosecuting attorney asked each of us the same question.

"If, after the presentation of evidence would you be able to come to a conclusion of guilt and sentence this person to serve time in jail?" I answered in the affirmative.

At the moment when the defendant's eyes met mine, I felt the awesome burden of the task ahead. Accused as set appointment now accomplice to armed robbery, if found guilty, her life would be forever changed. Looking for information about ? these 2015 personal injury lawyer articles reviews will give you some good insights.If I was chosen to serve on the jury, the fate of this young woman would rest in my hands.

I prayed for the jury to be filled with reasonable and prudent people who would take this duty solemnly. If I were in her place, I wondered if a jury of my peers would include people who would pay attention to the repetitious details of events long past. I caught myself dozing off hire us times in the aftermath of a big lunch.

Admin · 25284 vistas · Escribir un comentario

1, 2, 3, 4  Página siguiente